<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
>

<channel>
	<title>Legal Geekery &#187; Minor Geeks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://legalgeekery.com/category/minor-geeks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://legalgeekery.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 00:55:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
<!-- podcast_generator="Blubrry PowerPress/4.0.6" -->
	<itunes:summary>A podcast by law students meant for anyone interested in the law or law school.  We cover current events, hot topics within the legal world, law school life, court decisions, and generally anything we deem cool or geek worthy.</itunes:summary>
	<itunes:author>Josh Auriemma &amp; Laura Bergus</itunes:author>
	<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:image href="http://legalgeekery.com/images/lgpodcast-album.jpg" />
	<itunes:owner>
		<itunes:name>Josh Auriemma &amp; Laura Bergus</itunes:name>
		<itunes:email>legalgeekery@gmail.com</itunes:email>
	</itunes:owner>
	<managingEditor>legalgeekery@gmail.com (Josh Auriemma &amp; Laura Bergus)</managingEditor>
	<copyright>Legal Geekery</copyright>
	<itunes:subtitle>From particle physics to family picnics, if there&#039;s a segue to the law, we&#039;ll find it.</itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:keywords>law school, law, prelaw, pre law, law student, law students, gradschool, grad school, legal geekery, legal</itunes:keywords>
	
	<itunes:category text="News &amp; Politics" />
	<itunes:category text="Technology">
		<itunes:category text="Tech News" />
	</itunes:category>
		<item>
		<title>Google Neglects to Delete Wardriving Data</title>
		<link>http://legalgeekery.com/2012/07/31/google-neglects-to-delete-wardriving-data/</link>
		<comments>http://legalgeekery.com/2012/07/31/google-neglects-to-delete-wardriving-data/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 18:28:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joshua Auriemma</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Minor Geeks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalgeekery.com/?p=3911</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You may recall a few months back that Google admitted that a rogue engineer wrote some code to use its fleet of Street View vans to collect data from unsecured wireless networks. Today, Google sent an email to the U.K. Information Commissioner&#8217;s Office explaining that it sort of, you know, didn&#8217;t delete that data. The [...]<div class='yarpp-related-rss yarpp-related-none'>

No related posts.
</div>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>You may recall a few months back that Google admitted that a rogue engineer wrote some code to use its fleet of Street View vans to collect data from unsecured wireless networks.</p>
<p>Today, Google sent an email to the U.K. Information Commissioner&#8217;s Office explaining that it sort of, you know, didn&#8217;t delete that data. The ICO responded to the email and requested to examine the data before it is destroyed. I&#8217;m honestly not sure if I think that&#8217;s a good thing or a bad thing.</p>
<h4>Incoming search terms:</h4><ul><li>GoogleNeverActuallyDeletedThatStreetViewBreachData</li></ul><div class='yarpp-related-rss yarpp-related-none'>
<p>No related posts.</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://legalgeekery.com/2012/07/31/google-neglects-to-delete-wardriving-data/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Icelandic Minister of Parliament Ordered to Turn Over Twitter Account</title>
		<link>http://legalgeekery.com/2011/11/12/icelandic-minister-of-parliament-ordered-to-turn-over-twitter-account/</link>
		<comments>http://legalgeekery.com/2011/11/12/icelandic-minister-of-parliament-ordered-to-turn-over-twitter-account/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Nov 2011 03:09:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joshua Auriemma</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Minor Geeks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalgeekery.com/?p=3832</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s a popular week for judges ordering people to turn over their social media accounts to third parties. On Thursday, a US district court judge ordered Icelandic Minister of Parliament and former Wikileaks volunteer, Birgitta Jondottir, to release her login credentials to the Justice Department. Additionally, the court opined that users have a lessened expectation [...]<div class='yarpp-related-rss yarpp-related-none'>

No related posts.
</div>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>It&#8217;s a popular week for judges ordering people to turn over their social media accounts to third parties. On Thursday, a US district court judge ordered Icelandic Minister of Parliament and former Wikileaks volunteer, Birgitta Jondottir, to release her login credentials to the Justice Department. Additionally, the court opined that users have a lessened expectation of privacy with respect to their IP addresses, particularly where they agree to Twitter&#8217;s Terms of Service.</p>
<div class='yarpp-related-rss yarpp-related-none'>
<p>No related posts.</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://legalgeekery.com/2011/11/12/icelandic-minister-of-parliament-ordered-to-turn-over-twitter-account/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FCC Net Neutrality Rules Withstand Legislative Vote</title>
		<link>http://legalgeekery.com/2011/11/10/fcc-net-neutrality-rules-withstand-legislative-vote/</link>
		<comments>http://legalgeekery.com/2011/11/10/fcc-net-neutrality-rules-withstand-legislative-vote/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 03:29:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joshua Auriemma</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Minor Geeks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalgeekery.com/?p=3819</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today the Senate voted down a bill that would have overturned the FCC&#8217;s new Net Neutrality Rules. The current Rules are set to enter into force on November 20, although we can certainly anticipate a last ditch attempt at a preliminary injunction by the wireless providers.<div class='yarpp-related-rss yarpp-related-none'>

No related posts.
</div>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Today the Senate voted down a bill that would have overturned the FCC&#8217;s new Net Neutrality Rules. The current Rules are set to enter into force on November 20, although we can certainly anticipate a last ditch attempt at a preliminary injunction by the wireless providers.</p>
<div class='yarpp-related-rss yarpp-related-none'>
<p>No related posts.</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://legalgeekery.com/2011/11/10/fcc-net-neutrality-rules-withstand-legislative-vote/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Best to Get Caffeine Into Your Body</title>
		<link>http://legalgeekery.com/2011/11/08/how-best-to-get-caffeine-into-your-body/</link>
		<comments>http://legalgeekery.com/2011/11/08/how-best-to-get-caffeine-into-your-body/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 02:44:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joshua Auriemma</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Minor Geeks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalgeekery.com/?p=3803</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gavel bang to Ed Walters&#8217; Google+ page for bringing this chart to my attention. Obviously as &#8220;persons interested in the law&#8221; it&#8217;s important for us to know how to get caffeine into our bodies without all those pesky calories. Infographic from the good people at Information is Beautiful. &#160; Incoming search terms:InformationIsBeautiful&#124;CaffeineandCalories<div class='yarpp-related-rss yarpp-related-none'>

No related posts.
</div>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Gavel bang to Ed Walters&#8217; Google+ page for bringing this chart to my attention. Obviously as &#8220;persons interested in the law&#8221; it&#8217;s important for us to know how to get caffeine into our bodies without all those pesky calories. Infographic from the good people at Information is Beautiful.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><a href="http://legalgeekery.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/buzzbulge_960.png"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-3804" title="buzzbulge_960" src="http://legalgeekery.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/buzzbulge_960-207x300.png" alt="" width="207" height="300" /></a></p>
<h4>Incoming search terms:</h4><ul><li>InformationIsBeautiful|CaffeineandCalories</li></ul><div class='yarpp-related-rss yarpp-related-none'>
<p>No related posts.</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://legalgeekery.com/2011/11/08/how-best-to-get-caffeine-into-your-body/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Did California Just Unintentionally Impose Strict Duties on Bloggers?</title>
		<link>http://legalgeekery.com/2011/11/06/did-california-just-unintentionally-impose-strict-duties-on-bloggers/</link>
		<comments>http://legalgeekery.com/2011/11/06/did-california-just-unintentionally-impose-strict-duties-on-bloggers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Nov 2011 19:59:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joshua Auriemma</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Minor Geeks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalgeekery.com/?p=3776</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Eric Goldman thinks it may have as a result of a broad statutory definition of &#8220;book.&#8221; For another analysis, read Eugene Volokh&#8217;s analysis of whether the statute would prevent bookstores from reporting patron-on-patron crime.<div class='yarpp-related-rss yarpp-related-none'>

No related posts.
</div>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Eric Goldman thinks it may have as a result of a broad statutory definition of &#8220;book.&#8221; For another analysis, read Eugene Volokh&#8217;s analysis of whether the statute would <a href="http://volokh.com/2011/10/23/illegal-for-bookstore-owners-to-tell-the-police-about-patron-on-patron-crime/" target="_blank">prevent bookstores from reporting patron-on-patron crime</a>.</p>
<div class='yarpp-related-rss yarpp-related-none'>
<p>No related posts.</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://legalgeekery.com/2011/11/06/did-california-just-unintentionally-impose-strict-duties-on-bloggers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bing is More Microsoft Biased than Google is Google Biased?</title>
		<link>http://legalgeekery.com/2011/11/04/bing-is-more-microsoft-biased-than-google-is-google-biased/</link>
		<comments>http://legalgeekery.com/2011/11/04/bing-is-more-microsoft-biased-than-google-is-google-biased/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 14:19:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joshua Auriemma</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Minor Geeks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalgeekery.com/?p=3740</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A study published yesterday by the International Center for Law &#038; Economics seems to indicate that Microsoft uses Bing to promote its own products to a greater extent than Google uses Google to promote its own products. Might this have some effect on pending antitrust actions?<div class='yarpp-related-rss yarpp-related-none'>

No related posts.
</div>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>A study published yesterday by the International Center for Law &#038; Economics seems to indicate that Microsoft uses Bing to promote its own products to a greater extent than Google uses Google to promote its own products. Might this have some effect on pending antitrust actions?</p>
<div class='yarpp-related-rss yarpp-related-none'>
<p>No related posts.</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://legalgeekery.com/2011/11/04/bing-is-more-microsoft-biased-than-google-is-google-biased/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>One Website Sees 90% of Users Declining Google Analytics Cookies as a Result of the EU Cookie Law</title>
		<link>http://legalgeekery.com/2011/06/22/one-website-sees-90-of-users-declining-google-analytics-cookies-as-a-result-of-the-eu-cookie-law/</link>
		<comments>http://legalgeekery.com/2011/06/22/one-website-sees-90-of-users-declining-google-analytics-cookies-as-a-result-of-the-eu-cookie-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 18:21:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joshua Auriemma</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Minor Geeks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalgeekery.com/?p=3568</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[TechCrunch reports that the UK&#8217;s Information Commissioner&#8217;s Office has seen a 90% decline in traffic since since implementing the EU&#8217;s new Cookie Law.<div class='yarpp-related-rss yarpp-related-none'>

No related posts.
</div>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://legalgeekery.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/traffic-cookie-graph.gif"><img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-3569 aligncenter" title="traffic-cookie-graph" src="http://legalgeekery.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/traffic-cookie-graph-200x150.gif" alt="" width="200" height="150" /></a></p>
<p>TechCrunch reports that the UK&#8217;s Information Commissioner&#8217;s Office has seen a 90% decline in traffic since since implementing the EU&#8217;s new Cookie Law.</p>
<div class='yarpp-related-rss yarpp-related-none'>
<p>No related posts.</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://legalgeekery.com/2011/06/22/one-website-sees-90-of-users-declining-google-analytics-cookies-as-a-result-of-the-eu-cookie-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Congress Probes FCC Commissioner&#8217;s departure to Comcast</title>
		<link>http://legalgeekery.com/2011/05/21/congress-probes-fcc-commissioners-departure-to-comcast/</link>
		<comments>http://legalgeekery.com/2011/05/21/congress-probes-fcc-commissioners-departure-to-comcast/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 May 2011 16:02:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joshua Auriemma</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Minor Geeks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalgeekery.com/?p=3475</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Congress is looking into former FCC Commissioner Meredith Attwell Baker&#8217;s recent move to Comcast. For those of you who don&#8217;t know, Ms. Baker recently voted to allow Comcast to acquire a majority stake in NBC, and then jumped ship to lobby for Comcast. I, for one, welcome the inquiry.<div class='yarpp-related-rss yarpp-related-none'>

No related posts.
</div>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Congress is looking into former FCC Commissioner Meredith Attwell Baker&#8217;s recent move to Comcast. For those of you who don&#8217;t know, Ms. Baker recently voted to allow Comcast to acquire a majority stake in NBC, and then jumped ship to lobby for Comcast. I, for one, welcome the inquiry.</p>
<div class='yarpp-related-rss yarpp-related-none'>
<p>No related posts.</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://legalgeekery.com/2011/05/21/congress-probes-fcc-commissioners-departure-to-comcast/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Playstation Network Hacked AGAIN!</title>
		<link>http://legalgeekery.com/2011/05/18/playstation-network-hacked-again/</link>
		<comments>http://legalgeekery.com/2011/05/18/playstation-network-hacked-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2011 15:27:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joshua Auriemma</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Minor Geeks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalgeekery.com/?p=3472</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Those of you who follow me on twitter may have caught that I had to change my credit card as a direct result of the Playstation Network getting hacked almost a month ago. The Playstation Network recently resumed service in North America and in other parts of the world, only to be hacked again within [...]<div class='yarpp-related-rss yarpp-related-none'>

No related posts.
</div>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Those of you who <a href="http://twitter.com/legalgeekery" target="_blank">follow me on twitter</a> may have caught that I had to change my credit card as a direct result of the Playstation Network getting hacked almost a month ago. The Playstation Network recently resumed service in North America and in other parts of the world, only to be hacked again within a few days.</p>
<h4>Incoming search terms:</h4><ul><li>MinorGeeks</li></ul><div class='yarpp-related-rss yarpp-related-none'>
<p>No related posts.</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://legalgeekery.com/2011/05/18/playstation-network-hacked-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>YouTube to Require Copyright &#8220;Offenders&#8221; to Attend Copyright School</title>
		<link>http://legalgeekery.com/2011/04/15/youtube-to-require-copyright-offenders-to-attend-copyright-school/</link>
		<comments>http://legalgeekery.com/2011/04/15/youtube-to-require-copyright-offenders-to-attend-copyright-school/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 13:39:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joshua Auriemma</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Minor Geeks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[youtube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalgeekery.com/?p=3416</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From an article I assumed had been sourced by The Onion, it seems that YouTube will soon require that copyright offenders take a copyright law class before their accounts will be reinstated. This could be a good thing so long as an &#8220;offense&#8221; isn&#8217;t tantamount to &#8220;DMCA request received.&#8221; That&#8217;s unrealistically optimistic, though.<div class='yarpp-related-rss yarpp-related-none'>

No related posts.
</div>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>From an article I assumed had been sourced by The Onion, it seems that YouTube will soon require that copyright offenders take a copyright law class before their accounts will be reinstated. This could be a good thing so long as an &#8220;offense&#8221; isn&#8217;t tantamount to &#8220;DMCA request received.&#8221; That&#8217;s unrealistically optimistic, though.</p>
<div class='yarpp-related-rss yarpp-related-none'>
<p>No related posts.</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://legalgeekery.com/2011/04/15/youtube-to-require-copyright-offenders-to-attend-copyright-school/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
