<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The New Trend of Contingent Offers for Law Students</title>
	<atom:link href="http://legalgeekery.com/2010/01/13/contingent-offers-legal-job/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://legalgeekery.com/2010/01/13/contingent-offers-legal-job/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 03:24:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ouij</title>
		<link>http://legalgeekery.com/2010/01/13/contingent-offers-legal-job/comment-page-1/#comment-4183</link>
		<dc:creator>ouij</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 03:12:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalgeekery.com/?p=2651#comment-4183</guid>
		<description>@Josh, Yeah, that was a little weird right there.  I&#039;m not used to being a sock-puppet :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Josh, Yeah, that was a little weird right there.  I&#8217;m not used to being a sock-puppet :P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://legalgeekery.com/2010/01/13/contingent-offers-legal-job/comment-page-1/#comment-4182</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 17:46:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalgeekery.com/?p=2651#comment-4182</guid>
		<description>@ouij, Whoa, weird bug there.  I&#039;m gonna have to check on that code when I get home.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ouij, Whoa, weird bug there.  I&#8217;m gonna have to check on that code when I get home.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ouij</title>
		<link>http://legalgeekery.com/2010/01/13/contingent-offers-legal-job/comment-page-1/#comment-4181</link>
		<dc:creator>ouij</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 17:45:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalgeekery.com/?p=2651#comment-4181</guid>
		<description>@ouij, I suppose I&#039;d take &quot;desirable, yet available&quot; over &quot;available.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ouij, I suppose I&#8217;d take &#8220;desirable, yet available&#8221; over &#8220;available.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ouij</title>
		<link>http://legalgeekery.com/2010/01/13/contingent-offers-legal-job/comment-page-1/#comment-4180</link>
		<dc:creator>ouij</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 03:12:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalgeekery.com/?p=2651#comment-4180</guid>
		<description>@John, &quot;desirable, yet available&quot; is nice on Friday night, but on Monday morning, I&#039;d rather be employed and paid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@John, &#8220;desirable, yet available&#8221; is nice on Friday night, but on Monday morning, I&#8217;d rather be employed and paid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ouij</title>
		<link>http://legalgeekery.com/2010/01/13/contingent-offers-legal-job/comment-page-1/#comment-4179</link>
		<dc:creator>ouij</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 03:11:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalgeekery.com/?p=2651#comment-4179</guid>
		<description>I wish I had even a contingent offer.  As matters stand, I&#039;ve got--oh, that&#039;s right.  No offers.

Bitterness aside--Contingent offers are old hat for me.  In the UK, university admissions depend on contingent offers:  &quot;We are pleased to offer you a place, provided you score at least X on your upcoming examinations.&quot;

Someone with a better grasp of game theory might be able to give you optimal advice here, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wish I had even a contingent offer.  As matters stand, I&#8217;ve got&#8211;oh, that&#8217;s right.  No offers.</p>
<p>Bitterness aside&#8211;Contingent offers are old hat for me.  In the UK, university admissions depend on contingent offers:  &#8220;We are pleased to offer you a place, provided you score at least X on your upcoming examinations.&#8221;</p>
<p>Someone with a better grasp of game theory might be able to give you optimal advice here, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://legalgeekery.com/2010/01/13/contingent-offers-legal-job/comment-page-1/#comment-4175</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 15:19:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalgeekery.com/?p=2651#comment-4175</guid>
		<description>I think it puts you in the best possible situation, so long as you sell it right. Receiving a contingent offer states that you are valuable enough that someone wants to hire you, but you haven&#039;t been locked into anything yet. Desirable yet available.

I would be very upfront. State you have an offer, say why it is contingent, and make sure to remind them that firm offers are more appealing to you than contingent ones.

It&#039;s a bad lie to get caught in if you act like it&#039;s a bona-fide position. Not only do you seem untrustworthy, but now you also aren&#039;t on the mind of the person searching for an employee if something comes up in the interim.

If you were going to stretch the truth with contingent offers, the one tactic I might use is to never state that you&#039;ve accepted a contingent offer, only that you have one. Accepting a contingent offer and holding the offer really aren&#039;t any different, except that one makes people act like you&#039;ve committed to a job.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it puts you in the best possible situation, so long as you sell it right. Receiving a contingent offer states that you are valuable enough that someone wants to hire you, but you haven&#8217;t been locked into anything yet. Desirable yet available.</p>
<p>I would be very upfront. State you have an offer, say why it is contingent, and make sure to remind them that firm offers are more appealing to you than contingent ones.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a bad lie to get caught in if you act like it&#8217;s a bona-fide position. Not only do you seem untrustworthy, but now you also aren&#8217;t on the mind of the person searching for an employee if something comes up in the interim.</p>
<p>If you were going to stretch the truth with contingent offers, the one tactic I might use is to never state that you&#8217;ve accepted a contingent offer, only that you have one. Accepting a contingent offer and holding the offer really aren&#8217;t any different, except that one makes people act like you&#8217;ve committed to a job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention The New Trend of Contingent Offers for Law Students -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://legalgeekery.com/2010/01/13/contingent-offers-legal-job/comment-page-1/#comment-4172</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention The New Trend of Contingent Offers for Law Students -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 08:28:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalgeekery.com/?p=2651#comment-4172</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Legal Geekery, Bill Nigh. Bill Nigh said: RT @legalgeekery: The New Trend of Contingent Offers for Law Students - http://bit.ly/7GvcIe [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Legal Geekery, Bill Nigh. Bill Nigh said: RT @legalgeekery: The New Trend of Contingent Offers for Law Students &#8211; <a href="http://bit.ly/7GvcIe" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/7GvcIe</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

