<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Legal Researchers Rejoice! Google Scholar Provides Access to U.S. Case Law</title>
	<atom:link href="http://legalgeekery.com/2009/11/17/legal-researchers-rejoice-google-scholar-provides-access-to-u-s-case-law/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://legalgeekery.com/2009/11/17/legal-researchers-rejoice-google-scholar-provides-access-to-u-s-case-law/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 03:24:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: What I&#8217;m Reading &#8212; May 12 &#124; Scott Kuhagen</title>
		<link>http://legalgeekery.com/2009/11/17/legal-researchers-rejoice-google-scholar-provides-access-to-u-s-case-law/comment-page-1/#comment-5559</link>
		<dc:creator>What I&#8217;m Reading &#8212; May 12 &#124; Scott Kuhagen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2011 14:35:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalgeekery.com/?p=2515#comment-5559</guid>
		<description>[...] seen pointing out the constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act. Plus its cites are to Google Scholar for case law. Sample quote: If the Constitution were as defective as the bill’s opponents claim it is, a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] seen pointing out the constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act. Plus its cites are to Google Scholar for case law. Sample quote: If the Constitution were as defective as the bill’s opponents claim it is, a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jose Rivera</title>
		<link>http://legalgeekery.com/2009/11/17/legal-researchers-rejoice-google-scholar-provides-access-to-u-s-case-law/comment-page-1/#comment-4956</link>
		<dc:creator>Jose Rivera</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2010 03:23:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalgeekery.com/?p=2515#comment-4956</guid>
		<description>I just wrote a review of Google Scholar which I use pretty much every day .  You can see the article here: http://www.jrivera.me/google-scholar-the-review/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just wrote a review of Google Scholar which I use pretty much every day .  You can see the article here: <a href="http://www.jrivera.me/google-scholar-the-review/" rel="nofollow">http://www.jrivera.me/google-scholar-the-review/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Free legal research using Google Scholar&#160;&#124;&#160;Writing Shoes</title>
		<link>http://legalgeekery.com/2009/11/17/legal-researchers-rejoice-google-scholar-provides-access-to-u-s-case-law/comment-page-1/#comment-3993</link>
		<dc:creator>Free legal research using Google Scholar&#160;&#124;&#160;Writing Shoes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 21:05:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalgeekery.com/?p=2515#comment-3993</guid>
		<description>[...] aren&#8217;t going to cling to the old workhorses of the past without a really good reason. And ss Legal Geekery noted, the features of Google Scholar will only improve over [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] aren&#8217;t going to cling to the old workhorses of the past without a really good reason. And ss Legal Geekery noted, the features of Google Scholar will only improve over [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean McGilvray</title>
		<link>http://legalgeekery.com/2009/11/17/legal-researchers-rejoice-google-scholar-provides-access-to-u-s-case-law/comment-page-1/#comment-3692</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean McGilvray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 23:20:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalgeekery.com/?p=2515#comment-3692</guid>
		<description>@Daniel, Tell me about it. The library hobos are the worst, especially when they are browsing websites &lt;i&gt;of an adult nature.&lt;/i&gt;I think this might also put some of those shady sole practitioners who &quot;hire&quot; unpaid interns for their Lexis accounts out of business.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Daniel, Tell me about it. The library hobos are the worst, especially when they are browsing websites <i>of an adult nature.</i>I think this might also put some of those shady sole practitioners who &#8220;hire&#8221; unpaid interns for their Lexis accounts out of business.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://legalgeekery.com/2009/11/17/legal-researchers-rejoice-google-scholar-provides-access-to-u-s-case-law/comment-page-1/#comment-3680</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 17:53:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalgeekery.com/?p=2515#comment-3680</guid>
		<description>I am excited.  When I hang my shingle because I can&#039;t get on with a real firm, at least I know I can research for free without going to the local library and hanging out with the hobos!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am excited.  When I hang my shingle because I can&#8217;t get on with a real firm, at least I know I can research for free without going to the local library and hanging out with the hobos!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

