<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Glenn Beck, Parody, and Trademark</title>
	<atom:link href="http://legalgeekery.com/2009/09/16/glenn-beck-domain-names-and-defamation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://legalgeekery.com/2009/09/16/glenn-beck-domain-names-and-defamation/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 03:24:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: law webs &#187; &#34;law school ninja&#34; torrent</title>
		<link>http://legalgeekery.com/2009/09/16/glenn-beck-domain-names-and-defamation/comment-page-1/#comment-6135</link>
		<dc:creator>law webs &#187; &#34;law school ninja&#34; torrent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Oct 2011 15:53:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalgeekery.com/?p=2215#comment-6135</guid>
		<description>[...] 3.Glenn Beck, Parody, and Trademark Sep 16, 2009 &#8230; According to Ars Technica, in addition to the usual legal posturing and torrent of threatening letters Beck&#8217;s attorneys have filed a case with the &#8230; http://legalgeekery.com/2009/09/16/glenn-beck-domain-names-and-defamation/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 3.Glenn Beck, Parody, and Trademark Sep 16, 2009 &#8230; According to Ars Technica, in addition to the usual legal posturing and torrent of threatening letters Beck&#8217;s attorneys have filed a case with the &#8230; <a href="http://legalgeekery.com/2009/09/16/glenn-beck-domain-names-and-defamation/" rel="nofollow">http://legalgeekery.com/2009/09/16/glenn-beck-domain-names-and-defamation/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Magnesium Ascorbate</title>
		<link>http://legalgeekery.com/2009/09/16/glenn-beck-domain-names-and-defamation/comment-page-1/#comment-5237</link>
		<dc:creator>Magnesium Ascorbate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2010 06:39:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalgeekery.com/?p=2215#comment-5237</guid>
		<description>in China, they do not respect intellectual property at all. too many software and movie pirates out there &quot;&#039;`</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>in China, they do not respect intellectual property at all. too many software and movie pirates out there &#8220;&#8216;`</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peren Galoy</title>
		<link>http://legalgeekery.com/2009/09/16/glenn-beck-domain-names-and-defamation/comment-page-1/#comment-4830</link>
		<dc:creator>Peren Galoy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 04:04:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalgeekery.com/?p=2215#comment-4830</guid>
		<description>Glenn Beck has macular dystrophy, a progressive eye disorder that can lead to blindness.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glenn Beck has macular dystrophy, a progressive eye disorder that can lead to blindness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://legalgeekery.com/2009/09/16/glenn-beck-domain-names-and-defamation/comment-page-1/#comment-4645</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 18:51:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalgeekery.com/?p=2215#comment-4645</guid>
		<description>Most countries in the third world never respects intellectual property rights. piracy is so rampant in asian countries.*,:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most countries in the third world never respects intellectual property rights. piracy is so rampant in asian countries.*,:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Escort Amsterdam</title>
		<link>http://legalgeekery.com/2009/09/16/glenn-beck-domain-names-and-defamation/comment-page-1/#comment-4178</link>
		<dc:creator>Escort Amsterdam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 23:51:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalgeekery.com/?p=2215#comment-4178</guid>
		<description>Nice blog design here man.. is it hard to create a awesome design like yours? if you got the time i would appreciate u replying back to this comment but if not thanks anyways, i love your blog!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice blog design here man.. is it hard to create a awesome design like yours? if you got the time i would appreciate u replying back to this comment but if not thanks anyways, i love your blog!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zak Muscovitch</title>
		<link>http://legalgeekery.com/2009/09/16/glenn-beck-domain-names-and-defamation/comment-page-1/#comment-3095</link>
		<dc:creator>Zak Muscovitch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 22:34:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalgeekery.com/?p=2215#comment-3095</guid>
		<description>Very insightful article. Thank you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very insightful article. Thank you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kris</title>
		<link>http://legalgeekery.com/2009/09/16/glenn-beck-domain-names-and-defamation/comment-page-1/#comment-3081</link>
		<dc:creator>kris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 14:04:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalgeekery.com/?p=2215#comment-3081</guid>
		<description>Sean makes an excellent point re slander per se. 

this post from the citizen Media Law Project is interesting. http://www.citmedialaw.org/blog/2009/will-glenn-beck-sue-defamatory-website-2009</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sean makes an excellent point re slander per se. </p>
<p>this post from the citizen Media Law Project is interesting. <a href="http://www.citmedialaw.org/blog/2009/will-glenn-beck-sue-defamatory-website-2009" rel="nofollow">http://www.citmedialaw.org/blog/2009/will-glenn-beck-sue-defamatory-website-2009</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris_Wilson</title>
		<link>http://legalgeekery.com/2009/09/16/glenn-beck-domain-names-and-defamation/comment-page-1/#comment-3078</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris_Wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 00:24:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalgeekery.com/?p=2215#comment-3078</guid>
		<description>@kris, The standard for defamation of a public figure is much higher than the standard for a private individual- and Beck certainly qualifies as a public figure. Satire must be over the top to make its point. There are no &quot;claims&quot; on the site that Beck is actually a rapist and a murderer. Furthermore, the &quot;rape and murder a young girl in 1990&quot; portion of the joke comes directly from a Gilbert Gottfried bit during Comedy Central&#039;s roast of Bob Saget. The precedence for that being a joke is clear.

Would it have been any better (or had the same effect) if the claim had been that Glenn Beck lost his virginity to his mother in an outhouse while they were bith drunk on Campari?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@kris, The standard for defamation of a public figure is much higher than the standard for a private individual- and Beck certainly qualifies as a public figure. Satire must be over the top to make its point. There are no &#8220;claims&#8221; on the site that Beck is actually a rapist and a murderer. Furthermore, the &#8220;rape and murder a young girl in 1990&#8243; portion of the joke comes directly from a Gilbert Gottfried bit during Comedy Central&#8217;s roast of Bob Saget. The precedence for that being a joke is clear.</p>
<p>Would it have been any better (or had the same effect) if the claim had been that Glenn Beck lost his virginity to his mother in an outhouse while they were bith drunk on Campari?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean McGilvray</title>
		<link>http://legalgeekery.com/2009/09/16/glenn-beck-domain-names-and-defamation/comment-page-1/#comment-3077</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean McGilvray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 23:29:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalgeekery.com/?p=2215#comment-3077</guid>
		<description>Yeah. My knowledge of defamation is a little shaky, so I didn&#039;t want to expound on that too much. I&#039;m pretty sure that most states consider imputing criminal activity to be slander per se. Meanwhile, the Communications Decency Act should shield the ISP as far as I know. Then again, I think it would be hard to show New York Times malice in this case...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah. My knowledge of defamation is a little shaky, so I didn&#8217;t want to expound on that too much. I&#8217;m pretty sure that most states consider imputing criminal activity to be slander per se. Meanwhile, the Communications Decency Act should shield the ISP as far as I know. Then again, I think it would be hard to show New York Times malice in this case&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kris</title>
		<link>http://legalgeekery.com/2009/09/16/glenn-beck-domain-names-and-defamation/comment-page-1/#comment-3076</link>
		<dc:creator>kris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 22:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalgeekery.com/?p=2215#comment-3076</guid>
		<description>Satire of Beck, arguably, would be of a guy dressed like Beeker circling random people and drawing a conspiracy.

Call me crazy, but rape and murder might just be that step too far...

I get the &quot;disclaimer&quot; bit - but as you observe, how many people will not get it or overlook it altogether? 

Beck&#039;s argument may well include a claim for trademark infringement, but I would think it would also include an old fashioned claim for defamation. He will say the motivation was obviously malicious as the references to criminal behavior are untrue and aimed at damaging his reputation.

If these guys really thought it was satire, why remain anonymous?

Unfortunately (for us) this probably won&#039;t be tested in the Courts. No doubt the ISP will settle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Satire of Beck, arguably, would be of a guy dressed like Beeker circling random people and drawing a conspiracy.</p>
<p>Call me crazy, but rape and murder might just be that step too far&#8230;</p>
<p>I get the &#8220;disclaimer&#8221; bit &#8211; but as you observe, how many people will not get it or overlook it altogether? </p>
<p>Beck&#8217;s argument may well include a claim for trademark infringement, but I would think it would also include an old fashioned claim for defamation. He will say the motivation was obviously malicious as the references to criminal behavior are untrue and aimed at damaging his reputation.</p>
<p>If these guys really thought it was satire, why remain anonymous?</p>
<p>Unfortunately (for us) this probably won&#8217;t be tested in the Courts. No doubt the ISP will settle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

