This thread is for discussion about the 1L Mock Trial about to take place at the Penn State Dickinson School of Law.
By this point, you should have received a copy of Prof Gildin’s talk in your ANGEL account. If that’s not the case and you’d like a copy, please let me know by email.
This thread is to clear up ambiguity in the trial rules, problems, or rules of evidence. Please refrain from discussing trial strategy or asking whether we think that X tactic would be a good idea considering Y. We can’t help with substantive matters. With that said, we reserve the right to remove comments that we deem inappropriate.
If you’re thinking, “I don’t know whether my question is appropriate” just post it and it will be removed if it’s not appropriate.
Good luck!
[Edit: Now that trials have commenced, we are very limited in the types of questions that we can answer. We can't answer any questions that would give later teams an advantage.]
Incoming search terms:
- the state of lone star v toby baron
- mock trial discussion questions
- mock trial topics
- penn state dickinson school of law
- post mock trial reflection
- reflection of mock trial
- reflection questions fir the mock trial
- state of lone star v hamilton mock trial
No related posts.
{ 5 comments… read them below or add one }
Questions sent to me via email:
Q1. Can we ask questions such as what Toby Baron means when he says that Krista “initiated” sex? My presumption is that we would be unable to do so because the information is not provided in the depositions and would be, essentially, made up by the witness.
A1. (note to readers: this question comes from the perspective of the prosecution). The key idea here is “reasonable inference.” Upon being crossed, witnesses are able to make reasonable inferences based on the facts within the packet. The rationale behind this rule is that we want to keep the trial going and it would break the mechanic if you asked a witness a simple question and he’d have to say, “sorry, I have no idea.” It’s not the case when you’re directing because you’re expected to work out the questions beforehand.
With that said, if the actual question you ask Baron is “What do you mean that she initiated sex.” It would be within his discretion to start explicitly making something up — essentially he could say anything he wants ON CROSS so long as it doesn’t contradict the facts. If he started helping his case out during the direct examination, that’s when you impeach him by omission for “failing to mention” facts relevant to the case within his deposition.
So the moral of the story: opposing counsel’s witness = reasonable inferences okay; your own witness = stick to the facts.
With all that said, remember Gildin’s advice: “never ask a question to which you don’t know the answer.”
Q2. There is a note that states that we can look up relevant case law regarding this material. Since this occurs in the state of Lone Star I was wondering what this means. My presumption with this was that it was simply a vestigial element. I was unsure of this however and felt that I should ask.
A2. My interpretation of what this means is that any outside case law is merely persuasive authority. This makes sense since the neither the defense counsel nor the judge will have notice to adequately rebut your cases.
Question: Are you guys going to have exhibits printed out for us?
Answer: No, please print them out and bring them. The ones in the packet are the only usable exhibits.
Additionally, not only should you have your own exhibits, but you might consider having 2 copies. Maybe the judge will want to see one while you examine on it. You never know.
I’d also think twice about giving a judge a ruffled up three-hole-punched piece of paper as an “exhibit.” Remember those clear plastic covers from undergrad? I’m not saying they’re necessary but you’ll certainly look more professional.
Q. If we have already gone, can we go watch another person’s trial?
A. Unfortunately, no. The reason is that if you are a top D or P team, you would have extra coaching for the final trial against Carlisle. Additionally, once you walk out of the courtroom following your trial, you are still precluded from seeking outside assistance.
i think that it is great that you are giving away free stuff with the economy the way that it …