Comments on: ADR: It’s About The Money http://legalgeekery.com/2009/01/23/adr-its-about-the-money/ Tue, 07 Feb 2012 16:27:16 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Tweets that mention ADR = alternative dispute resolution. Non-litigation procedures like mediation and arbitration. -- Topsy.com http://legalgeekery.com/2009/01/23/adr-its-about-the-money/comment-page-1/#comment-4587 Tweets that mention ADR = alternative dispute resolution. Non-litigation procedures like mediation and arbitration. -- Topsy.com Sat, 08 May 2010 15:20:44 +0000 http://legalgeekery.com/?p=820#comment-4587 [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Mariel de la Garza. Mariel de la Garza said: @tre3tx ADR = alternative dispute resolution. Non-litigation procedures like mediation and arbitration. http://tinyurl.com/38r25el [...] [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Mariel de la Garza. Mariel de la Garza said: @tre3tx ADR = alternative dispute resolution. Non-litigation procedures like mediation and arbitration. http://tinyurl.com/38r25el [...]

]]> By: Ehren Bragg http://legalgeekery.com/2009/01/23/adr-its-about-the-money/comment-page-1/#comment-1356 Ehren Bragg Sat, 24 Jan 2009 18:26:13 +0000 http://legalgeekery.com/?p=820#comment-1356 Great information - thanks for publishing it. However, I have a question that I'm hoping you or others can favor with a response. Why is it that we can't expand the United States court system in such a way that incorporates all of these cases that are currently being arbitrated into a public forum? To put it differently, why not make more courts, more judges and more juries instead of letting consumers fend for themselves? It seems to me that the Supreme Court's encouragement of privatization of what should rightfully be an official public process is simply finding the easy way out. Thank you, Ehren Bragg www.arbitrationhorrorstories.com Great information – thanks for publishing it.

However, I have a question that I’m hoping you or others can favor with a response. Why is it that we can’t expand the United States court system in such a way that incorporates all of these cases that are currently being arbitrated into a public forum? To put it differently, why not make more courts, more judges and more juries instead of letting consumers fend for themselves?

It seems to me that the Supreme Court’s encouragement of privatization of what should rightfully be an official public process is simply finding the easy way out.

Thank you,
Ehren Bragg
http://www.arbitrationhorrorstories.com

]]>